Files
Aldehir RojasandGitHub acecd56032 common : implement common_schema internal representation for JSON schemas (#28736)
* common : implement common_schema types

* common : implement a json schema optimizer

* common : reduce optimizations

* common : refactor json-schema-to-grammar to use common_schema

* common : use common_trie

* common/schema : implement type/kind resolution

* cont : cleanup

* cont : remove common_chat_tool_parameters

* cont : simplify schema resolution

* cont : pass common_schema through the json-schema-to-grammar builder

* cont : cleanup

* cont : move enums under common_schema and add type enum

* cont : reduce test cases

* cont : clean up

* cont : clean up

* refactor : rename common_schema_parse to common_schema_from_json

* tests : fix gcc dangling-reference warning in test-json-schema

* tests : take the schema label as const char * to satisfy gcc dangling-reference

* refactor : rename common_schema_builder parse_* methods to build_*

* cont : fix may_be_string

* cont : properly handle empty tool parameters

* cont : add tests for empty $ref

* cont : remove dead code

* cont : update docs

* cont : make "{}" mean any object for json_object as well

* cont : restore (min|max)Length to imply string type

* cont : rename common_schema to common_chat_schema
2026-09-12 16:14:50 -05:00

288 lines
10 KiB
Markdown

# Parsing Model Output
The `common` library contains a PEG parser implementation suitable for parsing
model output.
Types with the prefix `common_peg_*` are intended for general use and may have
applications beyond parsing model output, such as parsing user-provided regex
patterns.
Types with the prefix `common_chat_peg_*` are specialized helpers for model
output.
The parser features:
- Partial parsing of streaming input
- Built-in JSON parsers
- AST generation with semantics via "tagged" nodes
## Example
Below is a contrived example demonstrating how to use the PEG parser to parse
output from a model that emits arguments as JSON.
```cpp
auto parser = build_chat_peg_parser([&](common_chat_peg_builder & p) {
// Build a choice of all available tools
auto tool_choice = p.choice();
for (const auto & tool : tools) {
const auto & function = tool.at("function");
std::string name = function.at("name");
const auto schema = common_chat_tool_parameters(function);
auto tool_name = p.json_member("name", "\"" + p.literal(name) + "\"");
auto tool_args = p.json_member("arguments", p.schema(p.json(), "tool-" + name + "-schema", schema));
tool_choice |= p.rule("tool-" + name, "{" << tool_name << "," << tool_args << "}");
}
// Define the tool call structure: <tool_call>[{tool}]</tool_call>
auto tool_call = p.trigger_rule("tool-call",
p.sequence({
p.literal("<tool_call>["),
tool_choice,
p.literal("]</tool_call>")
})
);
// Parser accepts content, optionally followed by a tool call
return p.sequence({
p.content(p.until("<tool_call>")),
p.optional(tool_call),
p.end()
});
});
```
For a more complete example, see `test_example_native()` in
[tests/test-chat-peg-parser.cpp](/tests/test-chat-peg-parser.cpp).
## Parsers/Combinators
### Basic Matchers
- **`eps()`** - Matches nothing and always succeeds (epsilon/empty match)
- **`start()`** - Matches the start of input (anchor `^`)
- **`end()`** - Matches the end of input (anchor `$`)
- **`literal(string)`** - Matches an exact literal string
- **`any()`** - Matches any single character (`.`)
### Combinators
- **`sequence(...)`** - Matches parsers in order; all must succeed
- **`choice(...)`** - Matches the first parser that succeeds from alternatives (ordered choice)
- **`one_or_more(p)`** - Matches one or more repetitions (`+`)
- **`zero_or_more(p)`** - Matches zero or more repetitions (`*`)
- **`optional(p)`** - Matches zero or one occurrence (`?`)
- **`repeat(p, min, max)`** - Matches between min and max repetitions (use `-1` for unbounded)
- **`repeat(p, n)`** - Matches exactly n repetitions
### Lookahead
- **`peek(p)`** - Positive lookahead: succeeds if parser succeeds without consuming input (`&`)
- **`negate(p)`** - Negative lookahead: succeeds if parser fails without consuming input (`!`)
### Character Classes & Utilities
- **`chars(classes, min, max)`** - Matches repetitions of characters from a character class
- **`space()`** - Matches zero or more whitespace characters (space, tab, newline)
- **`until(delimiter)`** - Matches characters until delimiter is found (delimiter not consumed)
- **`until_one_of(delimiters)`** - Matches characters until any delimiter in the list is found
- **`rest()`** - Matches everything remaining (`.*`)
### JSON Parsers
- **`json()`** - Complete JSON parser (objects, arrays, strings, numbers, booleans, null)
- **`json_object()`** - JSON object parser
- **`json_array()`** - JSON array parser
- **`json_string()`** - JSON string parser
- **`json_number()`** - JSON number parser
- **`json_bool()`** - JSON boolean parser
- **`json_null()`** - JSON null parser
- **`json_string_content()`** - JSON string content without surrounding quotes
- **`json_member(key, p)`** - JSON object member with specific key and value parser
### Grammar Building
- **`ref(name)`** - Creates a lightweight reference to a named rule (for recursive grammars)
- **`rule(name, p, trigger)`** - Creates a named rule and returns a reference
- **`trigger_rule(name, p)`** - Creates a trigger rule (entry point for lazy grammar generation)
- **`schema(p, name, schema, raw)`** - Wraps parser with JSON schema metadata for grammar generation
- **`schema(p, name, doc, node, raw)`** - Same, for a node of a `common_chat_schema_document` built earlier, e.g. one tool parameter
### AST Control
- **`atomic(p)`** - Prevents AST node creation for partial parses
- **`tag(tag, p)`** - Creates AST nodes with semantic tags (multiple nodes can share tags)
## GBNF Grammar Generation
The PEG parser also acts as a convenient DSL for generating GBNF grammars, with
some exceptions.
```cpp
data.grammar = build_grammar([&](const common_grammar_builder & builder) {
parser.build_grammar(builder, data.grammar_lazy);
});
```
The notable exception is the `negate(p)` lookahead parser, which cannot be
defined as a CFG grammar and therefore does not produce a rule. Its usage
should be limited and preferably hidden behind a `schema()` parser. In many
cases, `until(delimiter)` or `until_one_of(delimiters)` is a better choice.
Another limitation is that the PEG parser requires an unambiguous grammar. In
contrast, the `llama-grammar` implementation can support ambiguous grammars,
though they are difficult to parse.
### Lazy Grammars
During lazy grammar generation, only rules reachable from a `trigger_rule(p)`
are emitted in the grammar. All trigger rules are added as alternations in the
root rule. It is still necessary to define trigger patterns, as the parser has
no interaction with the grammar sampling.
### JSON Schema
The `schema(p, name, schema, raw)` parser will use the `json-schema-to-grammar`
implementation to generate the grammar instead of the underlying parser.
The `raw` option emits a grammar suitable for a raw string instead of a JSON
string. In other words, it won't be wrapped in quotes or require escaping
quotes. It only takes effect when the schema may be a string, as reported by
`common_chat_schema::may_be_string()`, otherwise the JSON grammar is used.
The downside is that it can potentially lead to ambiguous grammars. For
example, if a user provides the pattern `^.*$`, the following grammar may be
generated:
```
root ::= "<arg>" .* "</arg>"
```
This creates an ambiguous grammar that cannot be parsed by the PEG parser. To
help mitigate this, if `.*` is found in the pattern, the grammar from the
underlying parser will be emitted instead.
## Common AST Shapes for Chat Parsing
Most model output can be placed in one of the following categories:
- Content only
- Tool calling with arguments emitted as a single JSON object
- Tool calling with arguments emitted as separate entities, either XML
(Qwen3-Coder, MiniMax M2) or pseudo-function calls (LFM2)
To provide broad coverage,
[`common/chat-peg-parser.h`](/common/chat-peg-parser.h) contains builders and
mappers that help create parsers and visitors/extractors for these types. They
require parsers to tag nodes to conform to an AST "shape". This normalization
makes it easy to extract information and generalize parsing.
### Simple
The `common_chat_peg_builder` builds a `simple` parser that supports
content-only models with optional reasoning.
- **`reasoning(p)`** - Tag node for extracting `reasoning_content`
- **`content(p)`** - Tag node for extracting `content`
```cpp
build_chat_peg_parser([&](common_chat_peg_parser & p) {
return p.sequence({
p.optional("<think>" + p.reasoning(p.until("</think>")) + "</think>"),
p.content(p.until("<tool_call>")),
p.end()
});
});
```
Use `common_chat_peg_mapper` to extract the content. Note that this is already
done for you in `common_chat_peg_parser` when
`chat_format == COMMON_CHAT_FORMAT_PEG_SIMPLE`.
```cpp
auto result = parser.parse(ctx);
common_chat_msg msg;
auto mapper = common_chat_peg_mapper(msg);
mapper.from_ast(ctx.ast, result);
```
### Native
The `common_chat_peg_builder` builds a `native` parser suitable for
models that emit tool arguments as a direct JSON object.
- **`reasoning(p)`** - Tag node for `reasoning_content`
- **`content(p)`** - Tag node for `content`
- **`tool(p)`** - Tag entirety of a single tool call
- **`tool_open(p)`** - Tag start of a tool call
- **`tool_close(p)`** - Tag end of a tool call
- **`tool_id(p)`** - Tag the tool call ID (optional)
- **`tool_name(p)`** - Tag the tool name
- **`tool_args(p)`** - Tag the tool arguments
```cpp
build_chat_peg_parser([&](common_chat_peg_builder & p) {
auto get_weather_tool = p.tool(p.sequence({
p.tool_open(p.literal("{")),
p.json_member("name", "\"" + p.tool_name(p.literal("get_weather")) + "\""),
p.literal(","),
p.json_member("arguments", p.tool_args(p.json())),
p.tool_close(p.literal("}"))
}));
return p.sequence({
p.content(p.until("<tool_call>")),
p.literal("<tool_call>"),
get_weather_tool,
p.literal("</tool_call>"),
p.end()
});
});
```
### Constructed
The `common_chat_peg_builder` builds a `constructed` parser
suitable for models that emit tool arguments as separate entities, such as XML
tags.
- **`reasoning(p)`** - Tag node for `reasoning_content`
- **`content(p)`** - Tag node for `content`
- **`tool(p)`** - Tag entirety of a single tool call
- **`tool_open(p)`** - Tag start of a tool call
- **`tool_close(p)`** - Tag end of a tool call
- **`tool_name(p)`** - Tag the tool name
- **`tool_arg(p)`** - Tag a complete tool argument (name + value)
- **`tool_arg_open(p)`** - Tag start of a tool argument
- **`tool_arg_close(p)`** - Tag end of a tool argument
- **`tool_arg_name(p)`** - Tag the argument name
- **`tool_arg_string_value(p)`** - Tag string value for the argument
- **`tool_arg_json_value(p)`** - Tag JSON value for the argument
```cpp
build_chat_peg_parser([&](common_chat_peg_builder & p) {
auto location_arg = p.tool_arg(
p.tool_arg_open("<parameter name=\"" + p.tool_arg_name(p.literal("location")) + "\">"),
p.tool_arg_string_value(p.until("</parameter>")),
p.tool_arg_close(p.literal("</parameter>"))
);
auto get_weather_tool = p.tool(p.sequence({
p.tool_open("<function name=\"" + p.tool_name(p.literal("get_weather")) + "\">"),
location_arg,
p.tool_close(p.literal("</function>"))
}));
return p.sequence({
p.content(p.until("<tool_call>")),
p.literal("<tool_call>"),
get_weather_tool,
p.literal("</tool_call>"),
p.end()
});
});
```